A CUP OF TEA AND A SLICE OF ART, PLEASE.

 

Sweet Tea House artists in 1985. Gonkar Gyatso is fourth from left.

Emerging from the aftershocks, debris and trauma of the Cultural Revolution a loose-knit group of young Lhasa artists in the early and mid-eighties decided to come together to better utilize their individual creativity and to promote their own works.  They joking called themselves the Sweet Tea House Movement.

The contemporary art scene in Lhasa was then controlled by a Communist Party cadre and art-teacher, Han Shuli. He was the chairman of the Tibet Fine Arts Association, and vice-chairman of the Literature and Art Association of TAR. He had a strangle-hold on everything to do with art in Tibet, especially in Lhasa. Though Han had moved on from his earlier socialist realist propaganda pieces to pseudo-mystical, exploitively Buddhist themed paintings for the tourist market, he appeared not to have any real sympathy for Tibet or Tibetans. He used his position for personal travel and held two exhibitions in Paris, where he lectured at the Paris Fine Arts School on “My Life and Work in Tibet.”

In 1985, on the occasion of the UN proclaimed International Youth Year (IYY), a nationwide exhibition and competition of art-works was held in Beijing. Five young Lhasa artists prepared a number of their best paintings for the exhibition, but only one painting was selected. Chinese painters in Tibet were allowed to exhibit many more paintings.

Disappointed, the young Tibetan artists decided they had to do something themselves to exhibit and promote their work. So they founded the “ja ngarmo remoi tsokpa”, the “Sweet Tea House Group of Modern Tibetan Painters” that from 1985 held exhibitions of their works in the small Lhasa tea shops where Tibetan youths gathered to meet and talk. These artists felt that by exhibiting their work in a tea-house frequented largely by young Tibetans, they would be contributing to the cultural awareness of the youth of Lhasa. Our young artists were also aware that Monet, Courbet and other French impressionists had gathered at Parisian cafes to discuss their work.

I heard all this from Gongkar Gyatso, a member of the Sweet Tea House Group, and I am glad to say I was able to contribute a little supporting anecdote to the chronicle of this legendary group by letting Gyatso know that in 1888, when the paintings of Paul Gauguin were excluded from the official art section of the Universal Exposition in Paris, Gauguin just went ahead and organized his own exhibition at a nearby cafe. Gyatso seemed pleased that this cafe exhibition had been a big success.

The Sweet Tea House group disbanded in 1987 when, after a successful exhibition covered by Lhasa radio and television and attended by TAR dignitaries, the artists were badgered by the authorities to accept official sponsorship, and to allow party-approved Chinese painters into the group. Gyatso also told me that the group split up as a few of the artists wanted to move on and do new things. Some stayed behind in Lhasa and later formed the successful Gedun Chophel Artist’s Guild. Gongkar Gyatso decided to escape from Tibet and made the long journey to Dharamshala where I ran into him.

He told me he had hoped to find a “Yan’an” of exile Tibetans in Dharamshala, the kind of redoubt that the Communists under Mao had created in northern Shaanxi, to hold out against the Guomindang and Japanese armies. He was, of course, dissapointed. But my colleagues and I at the Amnye Machen Institute (AMI) cheered him up a bit by putting together a public exhibition of his paintings, the first ever in exile of a contemporary Tibetan artist. I remember it was on His Holiness’s birthday in 1993, and carried on for over a month at different venues.

In the following years AMI also organized exhibitions of the works of a number of other modern artists and photographers and also the first film festivals and screenings of films by Tibetan filmmakers. AMI’s many endeavors and achievements in these and other fields deserves to be described in a book to itself, or at least a lengthy essay which I intend to write one of these days. It was a truly revolutionary institution in exile Tibetan society and in its mission to spread the awareness of contemporary Tibetan art and culture the Amnye Machen Institute was, in the words of art historian Claire Harris of Pitt Rivers Museum, “… a radical organization trying to negotiate a vision of the future Tibet.”

Comments

  1. gyatso | October 27th, 2014 | 10:13 am

    There’s no doubt that AMI had a large impact in raising awareness for the arts in exile Tibetan society and an essay on those years would be most interesting. Meanwhile, if I may, here’s a link for those who want to see some contemporary Tibetan art, from both inside and outside Tibet http://goo.gl/bTZGpB

  2. Anthony OBrien | October 27th, 2014 | 1:02 pm

    What a fascinating and obviously frustrating story. Thanks for sharing this account with us, Jamyang, and I hope you will find the time and energy to write the proposed book.

    Irish art struggled to free itself from both British colonial influences, and then from nationalist propaganda styles. Believe it or not, the American tourist market, and indeed the American art market geberally still expect Irish art to be covered in shamrocks, or “Celtic”squirls.

    The most avant-garde Irish art, sadly, has become part of the internationally indistinguishable post-modern “conceptual” mirage. Individual identity in art is hard to find, with the relentless pressure to be original rather than traditional. What a minefield.

  3. Anthony OBrien | October 27th, 2014 | 1:21 pm

    Thanks to you too, Gyatso, for posting the link to Metchak. Tibetan culture is obviously going to survive and thrive with such amazing artists. Whether the traditional forms survive is a different mattrer. But what wonderful, visionary paintings are being painted by Tibetan artists, especially in Tibet, even under Chinese rule. Refreshing and inspiring. Brilliant.

  4. Leigh Miller | October 27th, 2014 | 4:47 pm

    Thank you, Jamyang-la, for your role with AMI and writing again about contemporary Tibetan art; I hope there is more to come. I completed my dissertation, “Contemporary Tibetan Art and Cultural Sustainability in Lhasa, Tibet” earlier this year, which focuses largely on another very interesting time period, 2003-2008. In relation to your piece here, I’d just note that Han Shuli continues to hold a powerful role in art circles in Lhasa/TAR. He also, from my point of view, ascribes to a very different notion of the role and identity of “artists” than do our friends in the Gedun Choephel Guild. You, Gonkar, and many others, are doing such good and important work.

  5. Dechen Tashi | October 28th, 2014 | 11:57 am

    Always; so much to learn from you ; Jamyang la . Thank you for your intellectual generosity if; what I am trying to say here ; makes any sense at all to you.Anyway; all I really meant to say is , thank you !

  6. Tdamdul | October 29th, 2014 | 11:14 am

    SUMPTUOUS!

  7. Choni Gyalpo Tsang | November 12th, 2014 | 5:03 pm

    Contemporary art is neither God nor ghost mixed everything on one Farm. That is the definition of contemporary art.

    Few days ago, accidentally attended an art show in New York” Tibetan Contemporary art” organized by Trace Foundation. Everything I saw was neither God or ghost. It is confusion and It is non-sense.

    I wish all those artists good luck.

  8. Annotated Internet Links | | November 16th, 2014 | 3:35 am

    […] http://www.jamyangnorbu.com/blog/2014/10/27/a-cup-of-tea-and-a-slice-of-art-please/ […]

  9. Phuntsok | January 13th, 2015 | 1:52 am

    I am writing what I felt, right after I saw Dechen Tashi’s thanks giving written to you.
    I actually wanted to say thank you to jam yang norbu la for these informations as I had a sight on this,but then comes second thought every time when I chose a side after reading your site. And I am saying that you have made a bad impression on yourself in the eyes of us youth.

  10. Samphe Lhalungpa | April 16th, 2015 | 8:41 am

    Hi. First ran into CTA when on a one time visit to Lhasa some 10 years ago, a very good friend from the U.S who travels to Lhasa every year and is also a supporter of the Gendun Choepal Gallery, took me to the studio and I was very pleased to run into young Tibetans who were, within the constraints of their situation, engaged in this form of self expression. I bought a piece and later when I returned to Nepal, where I was then stationed, collected several others, so that I have a very modest collection…also added pieces from India. Some folks think one has to be rich to enjoy the art, but I tell you, as I do not play Mah Jong, its a more satisfying way of consuming experience..and costs less..given the high stakes in both Kathmandu and elsewhere…..waiting to see how others handle the issues that face exile communities

Post a comment